Aakhir Tak – In Shorts:
- Opposition MPs filed an impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav.
- Justice Yadav suggested laws should follow the majority’s preferences.
- His remarks were made at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad event.
- 55 MPs signed the motion and submitted it to the Rajya Sabha Secretariat.
- Opposition criticized the statement as unconstitutional and biased.
Aakhir Tak – In Depth:
The Controversial Remarks
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, of the Allahabad High Court, stated during a VHP event that “laws must align with the majority’s wishes.” This statement, caught on video, drew widespread backlash.
Impeachment Motion Filed
Opposition MPs, led by Samajwadi Party’s Kapil Sibal, filed an impeachment motion in the Rajya Sabha. The notice accused Justice Yadav of unconstitutional conduct, hate speech, and bias against minorities.
Past Controversies
Justice Yadav has faced criticism before. In 2021, he made headlines for describing cows as sacred while deliberating a case on cow slaughter.
Constitutional Removal Process
Under Indian law, a judge’s removal requires majority support in both Houses of Parliament and a Presidential order. The process is rare and involves stringent criteria, including proven misconduct or incapacity.
Legal Experts Speak Out
Lawyer Prashant Bhushan called for an inquiry, claiming Justice Yadav’s comments breached judicial impartiality and targeted minorities. Experts argue such incidents highlight the need for judicial accountability.
Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember:
- Justice Yadav’s remarks have sparked a major controversy.
- The impeachment motion questions judicial impartiality and fairness.
- The case underscores the complexity of judicial accountability in India.
- Is this a step towards reforming judicial transparency?
Discover more from Latest News, Breaking News, National News, World News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.