Opposition’s No-Confidence Motion Against VP Rejected

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

1. The no-confidence motion against Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar was dismissed.
2. Filed under Article 67(b) on December 10, it triggered parliamentary uproar.
3. Deputy Chairman Harivansh called the motion flawed and made in haste.
4. The motion was alleged to damage the Vice President’s reputation.
5. Heated debates followed between the government and Opposition in Rajya Sabha.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

Background of the Motion

The Opposition moved a no-confidence motion against Vice President and Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar on December 10 under Article 67(b) of the Indian Constitution. The move highlighted concerns over Dhankhar’s alleged partiality in conducting the proceedings of the House. The Opposition argued that his actions raised questions about neutrality.

Deputy Chairman’s Rejection

Deputy Chairman Harivansh dismissed the motion, terming it “hasty and flawed.” He argued that the proposal aimed to tarnish the Vice President’s image rather than address substantial concerns. His comments fueled sharp responses from the Opposition, escalating tensions in the Rajya Sabha.

Reaction from the Opposition

The Opposition criticized the rejection, calling it undemocratic. According to their leaders, the motion sought accountability and a review of the Vice President’s conduct, aligning with democratic principles.

Government’s Defense

The ruling party defended the Vice President, stating the motion was unnecessary and politically motivated. They accused the Opposition of disrupting parliamentary proceedings instead of contributing constructively.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• The no-confidence motion targeted VP Jagdeep Dhankhar’s impartiality.
• The motion was rejected as it was deemed hasty and flawed.
• Sharp debates ensued, highlighting the strained government-Opposition dynamics.
• This incident emphasizes the significance of parliamentary neutrality.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio