Judge Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Rumors!

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

• The Supreme Court refuted rumors linking Justice Yashwant Varma’s Judge Transfer to cash recovery at his residence.
• The court clarified that the Judge Transfer decision is independent of the ongoing internal inquiry.
• The Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court has already initiated an internal inquiry into the matter.
• Yashwant Varma’s Judge Transfer was recommended by the Supreme Court collegium.
• The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has opposed Justice Varma’s Judge Transfer.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

The Supreme Court clarified today that Justice Yashwant Varma’s Judge Transfer to the Allahabad High Court is unrelated to the alleged cash recovery from his residence. The top court emphasized that an internal inquiry into the matter is being conducted as per established procedures and that the Judge Transfer decision was independent of the ongoing investigation. This clarification aims to quell any speculation surrounding the situation.

“There is misinformation and rumors being spread regarding the incident at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma,” the Supreme Court said in a press note, dismissing speculations linking his Judge Transfer to the discovery of cash. The court’s statement seeks to provide accurate information and prevent the spread of false narratives.

It further stated that the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court had already initiated an internal inquiry, gathering evidence and information related to the incident. The findings of this inquiry are expected to be submitted to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) today. The swift initiation of the internal inquiry demonstrates a commitment to transparency and accountability.

Justice Varma’s Judge Transfer was recommended by the Supreme Court collegium, comprising the Chief Justice of India and four senior-most judges. Following this, letters were sent to consultee judges of the Supreme Court, the Chief Justices of the concerned High Courts, and Justice Varma himself. The responses are currently being examined, after which the collegium will pass a resolution on the matter. The Judge Transfer process involves careful consideration and consultation with relevant stakeholders.

The controversy erupted after reports surfaced that firefighters discovered a large amount of cash in different rooms of Justice Varma’s Delhi residence following a fire. Sources said that while Justice Varma was out of town, his family members alerted the fire brigade, which, upon extinguishing the blaze, reportedly found the cash. This incident sparked speculation and prompted the internal inquiry.

Upon receiving information about the incident, Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna convened a collegium meeting. It was unanimously decided to Judge Transfer Justice Varma back to the Allahabad High Court, where he had previously served until October 2021. The decision highlights the importance of maintaining public trust in the judiciary.

‘NOT A TRASH BIN’
The Judge Transfer decision, however, sparked resistance from the Allahabad High Court Bar Association, which passed a resolution opposing it. Expressing strong disapproval, the Bar Association stated that the Allahabad High Court was “not a trash bin” and voiced concerns over Justice Varma’s relocation. This resistance adds another layer of complexity to the situation.

“We were taken aback that the Supreme Court has Judge Transfer Justice Yashwant Varma back to the Allahabad High Court,” a Bar official told PTI. The opposition from the Bar Association underscores the potential impact of the Judge Transfer on the Allahabad High Court.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• The Supreme Court rejected rumors linking Justice Yashwant Varma’s Judge Transfer to cash recovery.
• The Judge Transfer decision is independent of the internal inquiry.
• The Delhi High Court’s Chief Justice initiated an internal inquiry into the matter.
• The Supreme Court collegium proposed Justice Yashwant Varma’s Judge Transfer.
• The Allahabad High Court Bar Association opposed Justice Varma’s Judge Transfer, adding controversy to the Judge Transfer.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio