DMK Leader Says Lord Ram Was ‘Forerunner’ of Dravidian Model, BJP Reacts

In a recent event, Tamil Nadu Law Minister and DMK leader S Regupathy made a controversial statement that has sparked a political debate. Speaking at an event organized by Kamban Kazhagam, Regupathy declared that Lord Ram was the forerunner of the Dravidian model, a claim that has drawn sharp reactions from the BJP. This article explores the context, implications, and reactions surrounding this statement.

Lord Ram and the Dravidian Model

S Regupathy’s statement attempts to link the Dravidian model of governance with the principles upheld by Lord Ram. According to Regupathy, Lord Ram was a protector of social justice, a key element of the Dravidian model.

Key Points from Regupathy’s Speech

1. Social Justice: Regupathy emphasized that Lord Ram was a protector of social justice, promoting equality and fairness in society.
2. Dravidian Model: He claimed that before prominent Dravidian leaders like Periyar, Annadurai, and current Chief Minister MK Stalin, it was Lord Ram who embodied the ideals of social justice.
3. Secularism: Regupathy also stated that Lord Ram preached secularism, treating all people as equals.

The Historical and Cultural Context

The Dravidian movement in Tamil Nadu has been characterized by its emphasis on social justice, rationalism, and opposition to the dominance of Brahminism. Linking this movement with Lord Ram, traditionally associated with the north Indian epic Ramayana, is a bold and unconventional claim.

Understanding the Dravidian Movement

• Origins: The Dravidian movement began in the early 20th century as a response to the perceived dominance of Brahmins in Tamil society.
• Leaders: Key figures include Periyar E.V. Ramasamy, who championed rationalism and social justice, and Annadurai, who later founded the DMK party.
• Principles: The movement focuses on social equality, rationalism, and self-respect.

BJP’s Reaction

The BJP’s response to Regupathy’s statement was swift and critical. They argued that comparing the Dravidian model to Lord Ram’s governance is inappropriate and misleading.

Key Points from BJP’s Response

1. Contradiction: The BJP contends that the Dravidian model, as practiced by the DMK, is fundamentally different from the ideals of Lord Ram.
2. Sanatana Dharma: They also referred to past statements by DMK leaders criticizing Sanatana Dharma, contrasting these with Regupathy’s new stance.
3. Political Motive: The BJP suggested that Regupathy’s statement might be an attempt to gain political mileage by appealing to religious sentiments.

Political Implications

Regupathy’s statement has significant political implications, potentially influencing voter perceptions and party alignments in Tamil Nadu.

Potential Impact

• DMK’s Strategy: By invoking Lord Ram, the DMK might be trying to appeal to a broader voter base, including those with religious inclinations.
• BJP’s Position: The BJP may use this opportunity to criticize the DMK’s inconsistency and reinforce their own stance on Sanatana Dharma.

Public Reactions and Media Coverage

The statement has received extensive media coverage, with various reactions from political analysts, social activists, and the general public.

Highlights of Public and Media Reactions

• Support: Some supporters of the DMK have praised Regupathy’s statement as a bold move to integrate religious and social justice narratives.
• Criticism: Critics argue that the statement is a political gimmick and undermines the core principles of both the Dravidian movement and the Ramayana.

Historical Interpretations of Lord Ram

Lord Ram has been interpreted in various ways across different cultures and regions in India. While traditionally seen as a divine hero in the north, his portrayal in the south has also included more humanistic and socially relevant aspects.

Diverse Depictions

• North India: Lord Ram is predominantly seen as a divine king who upholds dharma.
• South India: In some interpretations, particularly in Tamil literature, Ram is also seen as a figure promoting social justice and equality.

S Regupathy’s statement that Lord Ram was the forerunner of the Dravidian model has ignited a significant political and cultural debate in Tamil Nadu. By linking the Dravidian model with Lord Ram, Regupathy has challenged traditional narratives and prompted reactions from various quarters. As the political discourse evolves, it remains to be seen how this statement will impact the political landscape and voter sentiments in the region.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio