Disapproving Marriage Not Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

• Supreme Court ruled that disapproving marriage isn’t abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.
• The case involved a woman accused of abetting suicide after opposing her son’s relationship.
• The bench quashed the chargesheet, citing lack of direct evidence.
• The court clarified that indirect or remote actions don’t qualify as instigation.
• This judgment clarifies the legal approach to abetment of suicide cases in India.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

The Judgment on Marriage Disapproval

The Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling, stated that disapproving a marriage does not constitute abetment of suicide under IPC Section 306. A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma quashed the chargesheet against a woman accused of pushing another woman to suicide.

Case Background

The case revolved around a woman who opposed her son’s romantic relationship. The deceased, reportedly in love with her son, committed suicide after the appellant allegedly disapproved of the marriage. The family accused her of making disparaging remarks.

Lack of Evidence

The court ruled there was no “positive act” or sufficient evidence linking the appellant directly to the suicide. The court remarked, “The acts of the appellant are too remote to constitute the offence under Section 306.”

Importance of Direct Instigation

For abetment under Section 306, the court emphasized the necessity of direct instigation or strong evidence proving coercion. It ruled that indirect comments, like disapproval of marriage, do not meet the threshold.

Implications for Future Cases

This ruling sets a precedent for interpreting the scope of abetment under the IPC. It clarifies that abetment charges require concrete, undeniable acts that directly force an individual to take their life.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• Disapproving a marriage is not abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC.
• Indirect or weak links cannot constitute abetment charges.
• This judgment refines legal interpretations in suicide-related cases.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio