Chief Justice Chandrachud Rebukes Lawyer in NEET Hearing

In a dramatic courtroom incident, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud reprimanded senior advocate Mathews Nedumpara during a Supreme Court hearing related to the NEET-UG petitions. The confrontation highlighted tensions within the court and underscored the importance of maintaining decorum during legal proceedings.

The Incident

On a recent Tuesday, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud intervened during the NEET-UG hearing after senior advocate Mathews Nedumpara interrupted another advocate, Narender Hooda. Hooda was presenting arguments on behalf of one of the petitioners. Nedumpara’s abrupt interruption led to a tense exchange with the Chief Justice.

Chief Justice’s Response

Chief Justice Chandrachud responded firmly to Nedumpara’s behavior. He instructed, “I am warning you. You will not speak to the gallery. I am in charge of the court. Call the security… have him removed.” This stern warning emphasized the Chief Justice’s commitment to maintaining order in the courtroom.

Nedumpara’s Reaction

Nedumpara, feeling aggrieved by the reprimand, retorted, “I need not be told this as I am leaving.” His reaction further escalated the situation. The Chief Justice maintained his stance, asserting that the courtroom was not a place for such disruptions.

Solicitor General’s Remarks

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the National Testing Agency (NTA) in the hearing, also condemned Nedumpara’s conduct. Mehta described the behavior as “contemptuous,” reflecting the seriousness with which the court viewed the disruption.

Past Confrontations

This incident is not the first clash between Nedumpara and Chief Justice Chandrachud. Earlier, during the hearing of the electoral bonds case in March, Nedumpara had interrupted the proceedings despite the Chief Justice’s warnings. Such repeated confrontations underscore ongoing tensions between the lawyer and the judiciary.

Nedumpara’s Contempt History

In 2019, Mathews Nedumpara faced a contempt of court charge and a three-month jail sentence for his conduct. He had been found guilty of contempt for making allegations against the judiciary, specifically targeting the designation process for senior advocates. However, the court later suspended his sentence following an apology.

Impact on Court Proceedings

The incident highlights the challenges faced by the judiciary in managing courtroom behavior. Chief Justice Chandrachud’s intervention aimed to uphold the integrity of the court and ensure that legal proceedings remain orderly and respectful.

Broader Implications

The confrontation between Chief Justice Chandrachud and Nedumpara brings attention to the broader issue of courtroom decorum. It raises questions about how best to manage disruptive behavior while maintaining the rights of all parties involved in legal proceedings.

The rebuke of Mathews Nedumpara by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud during the NEET hearing underscores the importance of maintaining decorum in the courtroom. This incident reflects ongoing tensions within the judiciary and highlights the need for respectful and orderly conduct during legal proceedings. As the judiciary continues to navigate these challenges, maintaining the integrity of the court remains paramount.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio