Aakhir Tak – In Shorts
- Chief Justice DY Chandrachud emphasized the need for strict measures against ‘bulldozer justice.’
- He asserted that silencing citizens by destroying property is unacceptable.
- The Supreme Court warned that selective demolitions by the state are dangerous.
- Citizens’ home security is a fundamental right protected by law.
- CJI called for disciplinary and criminal action against officials involved.
Aakhir Tak – In Depth
In his final verdict, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud declared that ‘bulldozer justice’ is unacceptable in a society governed by the rule of law. He stressed the need for disciplinary and criminal action against state officials responsible for unlawful property demolitions.
This statement was made in a case regarding a 2019 demolition in Uttar Pradesh’s Maharajganj, where a house was allegedly destroyed without prior notice. The Chief Justice noted, “Damaging citizens’ property without due cause or legal basis is extremely serious.”
Additionally, the court emphasized that any property-related actions must follow due process. Justice Chandrachud remarked that if ‘bulldozer justice’ were permitted, the constitutional right to property would be undermined.
The decision calls for strict measures to ensure property protection and accountability among officials. This ruling marks Justice Chandrachud’s final verdict, as his tenure ends on November 10.
Key Takeaways to Remember
- Urgent need for strict measures against bulldozer justice.
- Protecting citizens’ property is a core legal principle.
- Disciplinary action mandated for involved officials.
- Supreme Court’s final verdict by CJI DY Chandrachud.
