Bangladesh Faces Uncertain Future After Hasina’s Ouster
Introduction
Bangladesh is at a pivotal moment in its political history. The recent resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has ignited discussions about the future of the country, particularly concerning the potential role of the military in governance. This article explores the historical context of military influence in Bangladesh and the implications of Hasina’s ouster on the nation’s democratic future.
Protests and Military Response
On a Monday morning, defying a nationwide curfew, hundreds of thousands of protesters flooded Dhaka’s streets, demonstrating against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government. The protests, originating in areas such as Uttara, Shahbag, Kawran Bazar, and Farmgate, converged on Gonobhobon, the PM’s official residence. The large-scale demonstration was met with a surprising level of tolerance from the military, leading many to speculate about the army’s stance on Hasina’s regime.
Visuals from the protests showed interactions between protesters and military personnel. Soldiers were seen smiling and taking selfies with demonstrators, indicating a non-confrontational approach. Some protesters even climbed onto military vehicles, suggesting an implicit endorsement of their march.
The History of Military Influence in Bangladesh
Bangladesh’s relationship with military rule dates back to its early years. Since its independence in 1971, the country has experienced numerous military coups. The first significant coup occurred in August 1975, just four years after Bangladesh’s independence, resulting in the assassination of the nation’s founding leader, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.

Rahman, who led the country’s struggle for independence, was murdered along with his family by a faction of military officers. This event marked the beginning of a series of military interventions that have shaped Bangladesh’s political landscape.
Military Rule and Political Instability
Following Rahman’s assassination, Bangladesh saw a series of military takeovers. The initial coup replaced the secular government with an Islamic regime led by Khondaker Mushtaque Ahmed. Subsequent coups in November 1975 further destabilized the country, leading to a series of short-lived military governments.
Ziaur Rahman, who emerged from these coups, eventually established the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and became president. His rule marked a significant shift from the secular principles of the founding government. Rahman’s amendments to the Constitution and the introduction of the Indemnity Act, which protected Rahman’s assassins from prosecution, cemented the military’s influence in Bangladeshi politics.
The Ershad Era
Ziaur Rahman’s death in 1981 led to a brief period of instability until Hussain Muhammad Ershad, then army chief, seized power in 1982. Ershad’s rule was characterized by attempts to legitimize his authority through controlled elections and a political party he established. The military’s influence continued under Ershad’s regime, and the Indemnity Act remained a part of the Constitution.
Democratic Attempts and Military Backdrop
The 1990s saw a popular uprising that led to the resignation of Ershad and the reintroduction of democracy in 1991. However, the political landscape remained turbulent. In 2007, Army Chief Lt General Moeen Ahmed seized power briefly, highlighting the persistent role of the military in Bangladeshi politics.
Sheikh Hasina’s tenure, starting in 2009, was marked by attempts to remove provisions that had previously allowed military interference. Despite her efforts, her government faced several challenges, including a 2009 revolt by the Bangladesh Rifles and a thwarted coup attempt in 2011.
Current Situation and Future Prospects
As Sheikh Hasina exits the political stage, Bangladesh faces a crucial juncture. While some view her departure as a “third independence” from military influence, others remain cautious, remembering the country’s history of military rule. The army’s role in Hasina’s removal and the future of Bangladesh’s democracy remain uncertain.
Conclusion
Bangladesh’s history of military influence has left an indelible mark on its political landscape. With Sheikh Hasina’s resignation, the nation stands at a crossroads, grappling with the potential for a renewed military role. As the situation evolves, Bangladesh’s political future will hinge on the delicate balance between military power and democratic governance.
Discover more from Latest News, Breaking News, National News, World News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.