Ajmer-Sambhal Row: Impact of Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Remark

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

1. A legal petition claims Ajmer Sharif Dargah was built over a Shiva temple.
2. Sambhal’s Shahi Jama Masjid survey triggered deadly unrest.
3. Former CJI Chandrachud’s remarks during the Gyanvapi case are central to the debate.
4. The Supreme Court intervened, stressing peace and neutrality.
5. These cases highlight ongoing challenges to India’s communal harmony.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

Ajmer Sharif Controversy

In September 2024, Vishnu Gupta of the Hindu Sena filed a petition to declare Ajmer Sharif Dargah a Shiva temple, demanding an ASI investigation. This case symbolizes rising disputes over the historical origins of religious sites.

Sambhal Violence: A Trigger Point

On November 19, a court-ordered survey at Sambhal’s Shahi Jama Masjid led to violent clashes, resulting in five deaths. Allegations of police brutality and political incitement deepened communal tensions.

Role of Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s Remarks

Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud’s comment—that the Places of Worship Act doesn’t prevent historical inquiries—has fueled these legal battles. Courts now cite his remarks to justify similar petitions, raising debates about the Act’s interpretation.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• Ajmer and Sambhal cases reflect complex legal and communal dynamics.
• Ex-CJI Chandrachud’s observations have significant legal repercussions.
• Maintaining peace and upholding constitutional values is crucial.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio