Supreme Court Takes Note of Judge’s VHP Speech

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

1. The Supreme Court has taken note of High Court judge Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s controversial speech at a VHP event.
2. Complaints were received by Chief Justice of India (CJI) D. Y. Chandrachud regarding the speech.
3. The speech allegedly targeted a minority community, raising questions about judicial impartiality.
4. AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi signed a notice demanding Justice Yadav’s removal.
5. CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat called the speech an attack on constitutional values and secularism.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

Supreme Court’s Response

The Supreme Court has taken cognizance of the controversial speech made by Allahabad High Court judge Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav during a VHP event. The Chief Justice of India, D. Y. Chandrachud, has received complaints highlighting concerns over the judge’s impartiality and constitutional obligations.

What Was Said at the VHP Event?

Justice Yadav remarked that India should function according to the majority’s wishes, implicitly referring to Hindus. He also made statements implying that certain practices of a minority community could negatively influence children’s behavior.

Political Reactions

In response, AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi signed a notice seeking Justice Yadav’s removal, emphasizing the violation of judicial neutrality. The notice requires signatures from 100 Lok Sabha MPs to proceed. CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat also wrote to the CJI, demanding strict action and a comprehensive investigation.

Impact on Judicial Integrity

Legal and political experts have voiced concerns about how such statements might erode public trust in judicial institutions. The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) has called for an in-house inquiry and the withdrawal of judicial duties from Justice Yadav until the matter is resolved.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• Supreme Court takes action on a controversial speech by a High Court judge.
• Speech at a VHP event raises concerns over constitutional values and impartiality.
• Political leaders demand the judge’s removal and a judicial inquiry.
• Judiciary’s neutrality and public trust are at stake.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio