Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Ballot Papers Over EVMs

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

1. The Supreme Court rejected a plea seeking ballot paper use instead of EVMs.
2. The bench noted EVM tampering claims arise only after losing elections.
3. Petitioner KA Paul argued EVMs threaten democracy.
4. The court dismissed these concerns, criticizing political motives.
5. Congress President Kharge also advocated returning to ballot paper voting.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

Supreme Court’s Stand on EVMs
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition urging a switch from EVMs to ballot papers in Indian elections. A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and PB Varale emphasized that EVM tampering allegations are politically motivated, surfacing primarily after electoral losses.

Petitioner’s Arguments
Petitioner KA Paul argued that EVMs are susceptible to tampering and threaten democratic integrity. He cited statements from Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu and former CM Jagan Mohan Reddy, who alleged EVM vulnerability. Additionally, he referenced global concerns, including Elon Musk’s warnings.

Court’s Response
The bench countered these claims, stating, “If you win, EVMs are fine; if you lose, they are tampered with.” The court criticized the petition’s lack of substantial evidence and questioned its political undertones.

Political Reactions
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge echoed similar concerns, calling for a campaign akin to the Bharat Jodo Yatra to push for ballot paper voting. This reflects broader political sentiment amidst ongoing debates about electoral transparency.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• The Supreme Court reaffirmed EVM reliability, dismissing tampering concerns.
• Political claims of EVM flaws often coincide with electoral defeats.
• The debate continues as major parties like Congress demand ballot paper use.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio