Trump Questions US Aid to India: $21M for Voters?

Aakhir Tak – In Shorts

• Trump questioned US aid to India, specifically the $21 million for voter turnout programs.
• The Department of Government Efficiency slashed $723 million in foreign aid, including funds for India.
• Economist Sanjeev Sanyal called USAID “the biggest scam in human history.”
• Former Chief Election Commissioner SY Quraishi refuted reports of US funding to boost voter turnout.
• The BJP questioned the motives behind “external interference” in India’s electoral process.

Aakhir Tak – In Depth

US President Donald Trump has questioned the rationale behind providing US aid to India, particularly focusing on the $21 million allocated to increase voter turnout. Trump’s remarks highlight ongoing debates about the effectiveness and necessity of foreign aid.

Trump’s Question

“Why are we giving USD 21 million to India?” Trump asked. “They have a lot more money. They are one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us; we can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India and their Prime Minister, but giving USD 21 million for voter turnout?” These comments were made after signing executive orders at Mar-a-Lago. The president’s statements reflect concerns about economic reciprocity and the priorities of US foreign policy.

Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Cuts

The Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced a significant cut of $723 million in foreign aid funding. This includes the $21 million grant intended for India, as well as a $29 million program aimed at strengthening Bangladesh’s political landscape. DOGE emphasized that these cuts are part of a broader effort to eliminate unnecessary spending.

Expert Opinions

Economist Sanjeev Sanyal, a member of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council, strongly criticized USAID, labeling it “the biggest scam in human history.” Sanyal questioned the allocation of funds for voter turnout in India and political strengthening in Bangladesh and Nepal.

Former Chief Election Commissioner SY Quraishi also addressed the issue. He refuted reports that the US was providing money to boost voter turnout in India. Quraishi stated that there was no agreement for funding by any US agency during his tenure.

Political Reactions

The BJP also joined the debate, raising concerns about “external interference in India’s electoral process.” The party questioned who benefits from such interventions. The debate has sparked discussions about the impact of foreign aid on national sovereignty and electoral integrity.

Aakhir Tak – Key Takeaways to Remember

• Trump questioned the need for US Aid to India, citing high tariffs.
• DOGE slashed $723 million in foreign aid, impacting India’s voter turnout program.
• Sanjeev Sanyal criticized USAID as a “scam.”
• SY Quraishi denied reports of US funding for voter turnout during his tenure.
• The BJP raised concerns about external interference in India’s electoral process.

Aakhir Tak Editor-in-Chief

See Full Bio